Sunday, March 15, 2020
The Topic Can Be Proposed By The Writer Example
The Topic Can Be Proposed By The Writer Example The Topic Can Be Proposed By The Writer ââ¬â Assignment Example Darco Transportation v. Elmer Dulen Darco Transportation v. Elmer Dulen Issue: Is Dulen en d to receive workersââ¬â¢ compensation after engaging in sex with his co-driver while driving a tractor-trailer rig across the railroad? Rule Statement: Workers Compensation law is the applicable rule of law in this case. An employee can seek compensation for injuries related to work provided that: (1) the injuries were sustained in the course of duty, and (2) the injuries arise from the employeesââ¬â¢ employment (Mallor et al., 2013).Analysis: Workersââ¬â¢ Compensation law, for an employee to be entitled to workersââ¬â¢ compensation benefits the employee must have suffered his or her injuries while in the course of duty and the injuries must have occurred out of the employeeââ¬â¢s employment. In the case, Dulen was an employee of Darco Transportation and suffered injuries from accident while in the course of duty, ferrying goods San Francisco. Dulen involved in the accident afte r malfunctioning of the railroadââ¬â¢s signal arm, leading to the track smashing by train, which killed Dulenââ¬â¢s co-driver. Clearly, the injuries suffered by Dulen were work related. Even though Dulen was found to engage in negligent act by having sex with his co-driver while on the road, he was maintaining his driver seat, thus did not abandon his work or responsibility at the time of the accident. The injury of the complainant was clearly tied to his employment and originated from risk intrinsic to the nature of his work or employment. Therefore, despite the fact that Dulen was engaging in inappropriate behavior during the time of accident, he was executing his mandated role as a driver and the cause of his injuries can be tied to the failure of the railroad protective arms.Conclusion: Dulenââ¬â¢s injuries were on-the-job injuries, thus he deserved workersââ¬â¢ compensation. The court ruled in Dulenââ¬â¢s favor because the injuries were established to be work-rel ated.ReferenceMallor, J. P., Bowers, L.T. and Barnes, A.J. (2013). Business law: The ethical, global, and e-commerce environment, 15th Ed. Boston, Mass: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.